| ||||||||||
Horehound (Marrubium vulgare) Control GuideRevised 11/02 |
| Identification and Characteristics Distribution Dispersal Life Cycle Economic Significance Status under the Weed Management Act Integrated Management Non-Crop Roadside and Waste areas |
|
Horehound is of low palatability and the productivity of pastures carrying heavy infestations is considerably reduced. Sheep will graze horehound when alternative feed is not available but the meat of these animals may become strongly tainted by the plant. It takes about 7 days on clean pasture for animals to lose this taint.
The main detrimental effect of horehound in pastures is the contamination of sheep and goat fleeces by its dry fruits. The hooked calyx on the fruit is adapted for attachment to fleeces, leading to significant losses in their value due to matting.
Horehound tolerates dry soil conditions very well and may be the only plant present on stony, exposed north-facing slopes after prolonged dry periods. In this situation the plant has some value in protecting the soil from erosion.
As well as being an agricultural weed of pastures horehound has become an important environmental weed because of its ability to invade disturbed native vegetation.![]()
Status under the Weed Management Act 1999
Horehound is a declared weed in Tasmania, largely due to its impacts on agricultural productivity. As such, its importation, sale and distribution are prohibited. The legal responsibilities of landholders and other stakeholders for this declared weed are specified in a statutory weed management plan available from the Department.
Integrated Management
Control by Cultivation and Cropping
When horehound is densely established, the area should be burnt to stimulate most seeds to germinate and then ploughed in order to bury the plants, or to remove them completely because partially buried plants continue to grow. Summer cultivation is preferred because the disturbed plants are readily killed by the heat of the sun. Repeat cultivations are necessary when new growth appears and must be followed by the sowing of a crop or pasture suitable to the area to give maximum competition to seedlings. Spotspray any surviving plants in the new pasture.
Ideally, the pasture should not be grazed in its first year in order to give maximum competition to any horehound seedlings. For the same reason, rabbits should be controlled on the treated areas.
Mechanical Control
Grubbing is the most effective means of controlling small infestations.
Control by Grazing
In pasture, horehound populations show a marked response to seasonal conditions, pasture insect infestations and grazing pressure. Heavy grazing with sheep (block grazing) can eliminate seedlings but other less intense stock management systems may favour the weed by allowing stock to graze desirable species and avoid the less palatable horehound.![]()
Control by Competition
Infested areas cultivated for pasture should be sown down with a strongly competitive grass/clover mixture. In areas subject to drought or severe attack by pasture insects, either phalaris or cocksfoot should be included.
Non-arable areas, such as stony ridges or sheep camps may be hand sown or sown through a fertiliser spreader after herbicide application. The planting of trees is another option that can be pursued in areas where it is difficult to establish pasture.
Biological Control
A program is under-way to introduce natural enemies of horehound from Europe to Australia. The first of these, the horehound plume moth, Wheeleria spilodactylus (Curtis), was first released in southern mainland states during the summer of 1993-94.
The successful establishment and spread of the moth at mainland release sites resulted in the Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research initiating a mass rearing/release program for horehound plume moth in Tasmania. Between October 1997 and December 2000 the moth was released on 40 Tasmanian properties and is now well established at many sites.
For additional information refer to TIAR Weed Biological Control Pamphlet for Horehound.
Preliminary studies in Victoria indicate that the agent can significantly reduce seed outputs. It must be stressed that biological control does not involve the eradication of a pest species and is not expected to provide the complete answer to the horehound problem. It is intended that the moth will be eventually used in conjunction with control methods as part of an integrated management program.![]()
Chemical Control
To be most effective herbicides need to be applied when the plants are actively growing. Poor results will result if horehound plants are suffering from moisture stress at the time of application. Autumn and spring are thus the normal seasons for undertaking chemical control. In addition spring spraying will reduce the formation of flowers and seed, reducing the soil seed bank and fleece contamination. In any weed management program the first priority is to stop plants setting seed.
The size of the horehound infestation will determine the spray technique required. Patches or scattered plants can be controlled by spot application using a knapsack or spray gun while large patches may require boom equipment for economical control. Complete foliage wetting has to be obtained for satisfactory control and any boom sprayer used on mature horehound should be fitted with nozzles capable of delivering an output of at least 300 L/Ha. Horehound develops herbicide symptoms relatively slowly and it can take between 6 and 20 weeks for maximum development of symptoms.
For inaccessible areas, aerial application for horehound control may be the most appropriate method.
The most effective registered herbicides for the control of horehound in pasture are MCPA, dicamba, 2,4-D and triclopyr. For control in non crop situations bromacil can be used to provide residual control.
MCPA, dicamba, triclopyr and 2,4-D are suitable for use as boom applied sprays in pasture and to treat isolated plants and small infestations. All herbicides require the addition of a surfactant as the very hairy leaf of the plant is difficult to wet.
Trials conducted by the Department suggest that triclopyr is slow acting but very effective when applied at the rates recommended. Complete coverage of the plant is required to maximise the result.
Trials undertaken by New South Wales Agriculture in 1989 suggested that MCPA and 2,4-D were effective in controlling mature horehound and were cheaper and less damaging to pastures than other products registered for horehound control. These trials also supported Departmental data that the best results are achieved when spraying in autumn or spring.
The woody weed herbicide Grazon® (triclopyr/picloram) has recently been registered for horehound control and high volume spraying is recommended. Thorough coverage of foliage to the point of run-off is essential and a spray volume of 3 to 4L / 10m2 of infested area should be used. However, picloram, one of the active constituents in this product can remain active in the soil for extended periods and effect susceptible following crops.
MCPA, dicamba, triclopyr and 2,4-D retard clover (MCPA and 2,4-D are much softer on most clovers than dicamba and triclopyr) so where sub-clover is the main legume present in the pasture, delaying treatment until after the clover has set seed will minimise long term damage. However, delaying treatment in a dry season will reduce the effectiveness of the herbicide on the horehound.
Crash-grazing will usually eliminate horehound seedlings in young pasture and MCPA will suppress seedlings when applied at 0.5L/Ha of a 500g/L formulation.
The general use of herbicides containing 2,4-D during the period 15 September to 15 April is prohibited. Application during this period can only be made under a permit issued by the Registrar of Chemical Products, DPIW. Generally few permits are issued during this time.![]()
Non-crop, Roadsides and Waste Areas
Spot or boom sprays can be used as recommended for established pasture. Bromacil can also be used when residual control is desired.
![]() |
Some herbicides are toxic to bees. As a general rule, avoid applying herbicides when and where bees are foraging. Always read the label. |
Situation | Herbicide (Active ingredient) | Commercial Product (Content of active ingredient) | Application Rate of Commercial Product per Ha | With holding Period | Comments |
| New Pasture | MCPA dimethylamine salt | (500g/L formulations) | 500mL | 7 days | Apply to seedlings. |
| Established Pasture | MCPA dimethylamine salt | (500g/L formulations) | 700mL to 4L | 7 days | Apply to established pasture. Legume damage may result. Lower rate for seedlings, the higher rate for established plants. |
. | 2, 4-D ester | (400g/L formulations) | 700mL to 1.4L 2.8L to 5.6L | 7 days 7 days | Pasture containing legumes. Apply to seedlings. Pastures - without legumes. Apply to seedlings. |
. | MCPA + Dicamba | Banvel M ® (340g/L + 80g/L) | 4 to 7L | 7 days | Use higher rate on larger weeds. When necessary a second treatment may be made after 4 weeks. |
. | Dicamba | Banvel 200 ® (200g/L) | 700mL to 2.8L | 7 days | Lower rate for seedlings. Higher rate for young mature plants. Use 110 to 280L of mixture per hectare. |
. | Triclopyr | Garlon 600 ® (600g/L) | 1.6L | Nil | Apply as a thorough foliage spray. |
| Non-crop | MCPA dimethylamine salt | (500g/L formulations) | 700mL to 4L | - | Lower rate for seedlings, the higher rate for established plants. |
. | 2, 4-D ester | (400g/L formulations) | 2.8L to 5.6L | - | Apply to seedlings. |
. | MCPA + Dicamba | Banvel M ® (340g/L + 80g/L) | 4 to 7L | - | Use higher rate on larger weeds. When necessary a second treatment may be made after 4 weeks. |
. | Triclopyr | Garlon 600 ® (600g/L) | 1.6L | - | Apply as a thorough foliage spray. |
. | Dicamba | Banvel 200 ® (200g/L) | 700mL to 2.8L | - | Lower rate for seedlings. Higher rate for young mature plants. Use 110 to 280L of mixture per hectare. |
. | Bromacil | Hyvar X ® (800g/kg) | 8kg to 13kg | - | Use low rate in areas of low rainfall - <250mm. |
Situation | Herbicide (Active ingredient) | Commercial Product (Content of active ingredient) | Application Rate of Commercial Product per Litre | With holding Period after Application | Comments |
| Pasture | MCPA dimethylamine salt | (500g/L formulations) | 1 to 4mL | 7 days | Lower rate for seedlings, the higher rate for established plants. |
. | 2, 4-D ester | (400g/L formulations) | 5mL | 7 days | Apply to seedlings. |
. | MCPA + Dicamba | Banvel M ® (340g/L + 80g/L) | 6mL | 7 days | When necessary a second treatment may be made after 4 weeks. |
. | Dicamba | Banvel 200 ® (200g/L) | 2 to 4mL | 7 days | Lower rate for seedlings. Higher rate for young mature plants. |
. | Triclopyr | Garlon 600 ® (600g/L) | 2mL | Nil | Thorough foliage spray required. |
| Non crop | MCPA dimethylamine salt | (500g/L formulations) | 1 to 4mL | . | Lower rate for seedlings, the higher rate for established plants. |
. | 2, 4-D ester | (400g/L formulations) | 5mL | . | Apply to seedlings. |
. | MCPA + Dicamba | Banvel M ® (340g/L + 80g/L) | 6mL | . | A second treatment may be required after 4 weeks. |
. | Dicamba | Banvel 200 ® (200g/L) | 2 to 4mL | . | Lower rate for seedlings. Higher rate for young mature plants. |
. | Triclopyr | Garlon 600 ® (600g/L) | 2mL | . | Thorough foliage spray required. |
. | Bromacil | Hyvar X ® (800g/kg) | 6 to 8g | . | Low rate in areas of low rainfall (250mm or less). |
Agricultural non-crop areas, Commercial and Industrial Areas, Forests, Pastures and Rights-of-Way |
Herbicide (Active ingredient) Commercial Product (Content of active ingredient) Application Rate of Commercial Product per Litre Comments |
| Triclopyr + PicloramGrazon DS ® (300g/L + 100g/L)3.5 mL Apply pre-flowering as a thorough foliage spray with spray volume of 30 to 40L / 100m2. |

| A. Seedling | D. Flower |
| B. Young regrowth from perennial rootstock | E. Calyx showing hooked sepals. Flowers white |
| C. Flower branch |
Tasmania Online | Service Tasmania This page - http://www.dpiw.tas.gov.au/inter.nsf/WebPages/RPIO-4ZYW5L?open - was last published on 15 May 2008 by the Department of Primary Industries and Water. Questions concerning its content can be sent to Weeds Enquiries by using the feedback form, by mail to GPO Box 44, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001, or by telephone to 03 6233 6168. Please read our disclaimer and copyright statements governing the information we provide on this site. A text version of this page is also available. | ||